Journalists and TV people, we know, are （) to record what goes on: but in trying to get

Journalists and TV people, we know, are () to record what goes on: but in trying to get the best () they can, they may sometimes seem amazingly cold-blooded. In the massacre that followed the British quitting India, () was a photographer who made a sorrowing Indian family bury and rebury () dead several times () he got a perfect shot. A BBC sound man held up a Nigerian execution for half an hour while he adjusted his sound equipment; you could say it didn 't () any difference to the final outcome, but it doesn 't make you feel especially warm towards the man () .

Should journalists and photographers join in, () just stand back and watch while people kill () another？ It 's a tricky question, not just a () of how brave anyone is feeling at the time, () without authentic pictures, how will the world know, how should the world believe () crimes are committed？ One dead photographer does not do much for the cause he cares about, even () he did feel forced to join in and take sides.

To stay out of the fight, to write () what 's going on, to treat () with both sides, as a doctor will cure soldiers in () uniform. or a lawyer argue for either side —that is supposed to be our code, and when it () to the crutch, we probably do better trying to stick () that, than rushing off on individual impulse. But is there not a point in any profession () you are forced back against the wall () a human being？ I think there is, and I was.

1、A) ready B) supposed C) responsible D) eager

2、A) record B) report C) essay D) article

3、A) here B) where C) there D) he

4、A) its B) the C) their D) that

5、A) when B) after C) before D) till

6、A) do B) become C) change D) make

7、A) concerning B) concerns C) concerned D) concern

8、A) but B) or C) and D) only

9、A) each B) every C) one D) all

10、A) fact B) case C) thing D) matter

11、A) but B) although C) for D) because

12、A) which B) what C) that D) such