题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
[单选题]
-__-It’s 70 yuan（）
A.How many are there
B.How much is it
C.How much are they
答案
H
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
答案
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
A.How many are there
B.How much is it
C.How much are they
答案
H
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“-__-It’s 70 yuan（）”相关的问题
Dalie Limited Liability Co (Dalie Co) applied to the people’s court for bankruptcy due to its poor business operations. On 30 April 2012, the people’s court rendered an order to accept the bankruptcy application and designated a bankruptcy administrator. At this moment, Dalie Co faced the following key financial matters:
(i) Construction Company had brought a lawsuit against Dalie Co for its delay to pay the construction price due, but the case was still pending for trial;
(ii) Dalie Co owed a loan totalling RMB 20 million yuan to Industry Bank, of which RMB 12 million yuan was secured by a guarantee agreement on the buildings of Dalie Co;
(iii) Dalie Co had provided a guarantee to Merchant Bank for a loan of RMB 10 million yuan borrowed by Jiqing Company. The loan has matured but Jiqing Company failed to repay the principal and interest.
Required:
Answer the following questions in accordance with the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of China, and give your reasons for your answers:
(a) state how to deal with the pending disputes between Construction Company and Dalie Co; (3 marks)
(b) state how to deal with the loan of RMB 20 million yuan owed to Industry Bank; (3 marks)
(c) state whether Merchant Bank was entitled to declare the credit and join the bankruptcy procedure. (4 marks)
A: Will that be OK？
B: How much are the tickets？
C: Two second-class is fine, thank you.
D: May I help you？
E: Have a nice trip
W: Good morning. 26____________
M: Hi, we&39;d like two tickets to Fuzhou, please.
W: Fuzhou. Certainly. Travelling today？
M: Yes. W: The next train is at 12: 00. 27___________
M: I’ll take the 12: 00 tickets.
W: Single or return？
M: Two singles. 28___________
W:First-class is 100 yuan and second-class is 80 yuan.
M: 29___________
W: that&39;s 160 yuan, please.
M: Here’s the money
W: And here are your tickets. 30___________
26、__________
27_________
28_________
29_________
30_________
请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析，谢谢！
Buyer made the advance payment, but Seller did not deliver any goods. Buyer urged Seller to deliver the goods immediately, as its production would be seriously affected by the short supply of the goods. However, Seller declared force majeure as the reason for non-delivery. Seller insisted that it was only a trading company, not a producer of the chemical products. Seller alleged that upon the conclusion of the contract, it entered into a purchase agreement with a producer to buy the goods from the latter. Due to a fire accident, the producer could not supply the goods under the purchase agreement; Seller therefore could not deliver the goods to Buyer. Non-delivery of goods was due to force majeure that caused the failure to supply the goods by the producer to Seller.
Buyer refused to accept Seller’s argument and bought 10,000 kg of the same products for replacement at a price of RMB 220 yuan/kg, resulting in a total extra cost of RMB 200,000 yuan. Meanwhile it filed a lawsuit against Seller in the court, requesting liquidated damages of RMB 400,000 yuan (20% of the total price) and the damages of RMB 200,000 yuan for extra price caused for the urgent purchase.
Required:
Answer the following questions in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Contract Law, and give your reasons for your answer:
(a) state whether Seller’s argument of force majeure can be established; (5 marks)
(b) state whether Buyer’s claims for liquidated damages and damages should be supported by the court. (5 marks)
In June 2011 Mr Fang leased the same house to Ms Lee for a period of two years.
Due to the sudden change of the market and poor operation of his enterprise, Mr Fang was unable to repay the principal and interest as agreed when the loan matured at the end of January 2012. Credit Association filed a lawsuit in the people’s court and obtained a judgement in favour of its claim for the principal RMB 2 million yuan plus interest.
Credit Association then advised Ms Lee to leave the house, as it has been authorised by the people’s court to organise a public auction to sell the house for the enforcement of the judgement. Ms Lee refused to leave the house on the grounds that the lease agreement was an effective one between Mr Fang and herself and would last until the end of June 2013. In addition, Credit Association’s right of mortgagee should not affect her right under the lease agreement.
Required:
Answer the following questions in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Property Law, and give your reasons for your answer:
(a) state whether Ms Lee’s grounds for refusal to leave the house can be established. (5 marks)
(b) state how Ms Lee should deal with the current situation. (5 marks)
Yado Steel Co Ltd (Yado Steel) entered into a loan agreement with Industry Bank to borrow RMB 20 million yuan for its expansion programme. Yado Steel provided its office building as property mortgaged for the debt, and made the registration as required. Mr Ding, one of the shareholders of Yado Steel, placed a guarantee letter of general liability in favour of Industry Bank.
Due to poor performance, Yado Steel failed to repay the debt when it came to maturity. Meanwhile, Industry Bank, under a restructuring plan, transferred the credit of RMB 20 million yuan together with the right of pledge to Oriental Assets Management Co (OAM). It also made a written notice to Yado Steel and Mr Ding, but failed to transfer the right of mortgage to OAM. On the contrary, Industry Bank concluded an agreement with Yado Steel before it went bankrupt, and settled other debts owed by the latter through the sale of the office building as mortgaged for the loan. Having found this fact, OAM, as a transferee of the credit, requested the court to order Mr Ding to bear its guarantor’s liability for the debt. Mr Ding asserted that he was a pledger with a general liability and would be responsible for the debt only if the things mortgaged could not satisfy the debt.
Required:
Answer the following questions in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Property Law and the Contract Law, and give your reasons for your answer:
(a) State whether the defence of Mr Ding should be supported by the court. (6 marks)
(b) State what was the cause of this dispute between OAM and Industry Bank. (4 marks)
Shenhua Company Ltd (Shenhua) has been buying products from Kangyi Chemicals Company (Kangyi Chemicals) for more than one year. By the end of 2013, the two parties negotiated to settle the previous business transactions and confirmed that Shenhua owed an outstanding amount of RMB 800,000 yuan to Kangyi Chemicals.
Several days later, Shenhua entered into an agreement with its holding company, namely Shenhua Holdings, to transfer all its debts of RMB 800,000 yuan due. In doing so, Shenhua neither notified Kangyi Chemicals, nor got a consent from Kangyi Chemicals.
Having discovered this information, Kangyi Chemicals sent an email to Shenhua Holdings to inquire whether Shenhua’s debts had been transferred to Shenhua Holdings. Shenhua Holdings acknowledged the transfer but did not promise to settle the debts as a new debtor.
Kangyi Chemicals filed a lawsuit against Shenhua Holdings for the unsettled RMB 800,000 yuan. Shenhua Holdings submitted the following defences: First, the transfer agreement between Shenhua and Shenhua Holdings was an invalid one as Shenhua failed to get prior consent, as required by the law, from Kangyi Chemicals before the completion of transfer. Second, the goods delivered by Kangyi Chemicals in the last six months contained material defects which caused loss and damage to Shenhua as the original counterparty.
Required:
Answer the following questions in accordance with the Contract Law, and give your reasons for your answers:
(a) state whether the transfer agreement between Shenhua and Shenhua Holdings was a valid one; (6 marks)
(b) state whether Shenhua Holdings was entitled to submit its defence on the ground of the defects in the goods delivered by Kangyi Chemicals to Shenhua. (4 marks)
